Can you imagine receiving a stiff fine for wishing someone Merry Christmas?
Sounds like something from a dystopian future imagined by those who annually complain about the "war on Christmas."
This scenarios is actually from 17th century Boston, where Christmas was banned for over two decades in the 1600's. That's right - from 1659 until 1681, it was officially illegal to observe Christmas in Boston by taking the day off from work, feasting or celebrating in any other way.
Those in violation were fined five shillings - the exact contemporary value of which is debated by economic historians - but suffice it to say, was an incredibly steep fine back then!
So what gives, 16th century Bostonians? Have historians since discovered that the hearts of these colonial grinches were two sizes too small?
Or is there a more nuanced, fascinating historical explanation? Of course there is!
"Christmas is so 200 B.C."
Understanding the social and political climate in England and her colonies in the 1600's is key to figuring out why the heck Christmas got banned in the first place. At that time in history, the majority of the population of Boston was Puritan. The Puritans spurned the traditions of the Roman Catholic Church, and constantly rallied against the Church of England for adopting any remotely Catholic practices.
The extremely conservative tenets of Puritanism yielded more than a few reasons for Bostonians to despise Christmas:
It wasn't really the birthday of Jesus: December 25th was only declared the birth of Jesus by Pope Julius I in the 4th century A.D. Since then, many have debated the date of the actual birth of Jesus, with very little consensus. But either way, the Puritans were all about scripture. According to them, there was nowhere in the scripture that said to celebrate December 25th as the birth of Jesus, so they saw no need to.
Christmas was too pagan: Not only was the observation of Christmas left out of biblical texts, the date of December 25th was a decidedly blasphemous one: Julius I likely picked December 25th to hasten the adoption of the Christian holiday. It now coincided with an already widely-celebrated Roman holiday, Saturnalia - a celebration filled with raucous parties and drunken misbehavior. Puritans were always quick (and usually correct) to highlight the Pagan underpinnings of Catholicism.
Partying was un-Puritan: Puritans had particular problems with wild behavior induced alcohol and gluttony. Conservatives in England and the Colonies campaigned against the Christmas tradition of "wassailing" in which the lower classes would go door-to-door requesting food and drink from their wealthier counterparts in exchange for toasting their good health. If refused, the hosts would suffer a great deal of mischief or even violence. Interestingly, this debate gave rise to Father Christmas in England. Proponents of Christmas merriment often invoked this personification, who was a mild-mannered cheery old man that had a "good but not too good" time on the holidays.
Pamphlet printed in 1653 in support of Christmas. Father Christmas (center) is turned away by the Roundhead soldier on the left, but the countryman on the right advises Father Christmas not to fear - he still celebrates Christmas. The Vindication of Christmas, 1653 (woodcut and letterpress), Private Collection / Bridgeman Images
Rebellion against England: Yes, the Colonists were already clashing with the English government over 100 years before the American Revolution. New Englanders believed the Crown meddled in their affairs all too often, and Christmas was yet another example. Colonists saw the celebration of Christmas as an extension of English interference in colonial affairs and an affront to their freedom and independence. In fact, Bostonians eventually revolted and attempted to overthrow an English governor who forced shops and schools to close on Christmas in 1686.
A 19th-century interpretation of the 1689 revolt and arrest of Governor Andros
Christmas restored, sort of
You would think that such a ban would be met with outcries from the general population, but that wasn't the case initially. Most Bostonians wholeheartedly agreed with the ban, and in fact relished working on Christmas day as an act of defiance against meddling foreign governments and rival Christian sects.
Bostonians wholeheartedly agreed with the ban, and in fact relished working on Christmas day - an act of defiance against meddling foreign governments and rival Christian sects.
As the English government struggled to control Puritan New England, the Crown installed English-friendly governors that re-instituted laws supporting English customs. The ban on Christmas was finally lifted in 1681, but the Puritans continued to rally against the holiday - many sources recount Puritans marching through the streets on Christmas Eve shouting "No Christmas! No Christmas!" well after the ban was lifted.
This social ban on Christmas didn't really wane even as non-Puritans immigrated to Boston. Schools were officially open on Christmas day as late as 1870, with harsh punishments for children who skipped out.
Elsewhere outside of the Puritan-dominated Northeast, Christmas was more widely celebrated - Colonists in Jamestown noted a successful celebration early in their arrival in Virginia, and other states in the U.S. recognized Christmas as an official holiday in the early 1800's.
In 1870, Ulysses S. Grant would be the first president to declare Christmas a national holiday, and thanks to Charles Dickens' A Christmas Carol, the holiday experienced a renaissance, the fruits of which we enjoy to this day.